Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Help with some ID

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Learner Driver ronnocopark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Baldivis WA
    Posts
    9

    Help with some ID

    Gday, can anyone help out with the ID of this van?
    Model:HZ8WM70
    Trim:1926-63V
    Paint:568-30517
    Eng: L32 Trans:M20 RRaxle: GV4

    GVW: 2000kg
    Seating Cap: 2

    8M70RJL427425Z

    Just wondering if it's a Sandman or not? It's got a full headlining the correct welded attachments at the rear.

    Cheers Alex.

  2. #2
    It's a rockin' adam perth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,222
    Quote Originally Posted by ronnocopark View Post
    Gday, can anyone help out with the ID of this van?
    Model:HZ8WM70
    Trim:1926-63V
    Paint:568-30517
    Eng: L32 Trans:M20 RRaxle: GV4

    GVW: 2000kg
    Seating Cap: 2

    8M70RJL427425Z

    Just wondering if it's a Sandman or not? It's got a full headlining the correct welded attachments at the rear.

    Cheers Alex.

    yep looks like one, XX7
    "All correspondence must bear these numbers"

  3. #3
    Learner Driver ronnocopark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Baldivis WA
    Posts
    9
    Thanks Adam.....appreciate the help mate.

    How can you tell it's a XX7 ?

    Just wondering if you have any bucket seats, interior door panels and kick panels for sale?

    I spoke to you a while ago and I knew you had a few holden parts for sale.

    Cheers Alex
    Last edited by ronnocopark; 06-08-2010 at 06:26 PM. Reason: Spelling & added more text.

  4. #4
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    As long as the BODY plate displays BODY number 427425, build date is 9/78 or 10/78 and the chassis number is close to BHZ33000A then you most likely have a complete HZ XX7. The main giveaway is the 2000kg GVW.

  5. #5
    Leadfoot 1BadVan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by HK1837 View Post
    As long as the BODY plate displays BODY number 427425, build date is 9/78 or 10/78 and the chassis number is close to BHZ33000A then you most likely have a complete HZ XX7. The main giveaway is the 2000kg GVW.
    I can understand the GVW 2000kg, build date and the chassis number being close to acertain number but why does the body number HAVE to display the numbers 427425.

    Cheers Dave

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    4,463
    Because that is its body number. It is contained in the number 8M70RJL427425Z.

    8 M(base model) 70(body style) R(engine type) J(model year) L4(assembly plant) 27425(Vehicle serial number) Z(series code).
    Base model.........panelvan............253............. ......79?...............Adelaide..............body number...........................HZ
    Last edited by wbute; 13-08-2010 at 03:56 PM. Reason: More detail

  7. #7
    It's a rockin' adam perth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,222
    Quote Originally Posted by ronnocopark View Post
    Thanks Adam.....appreciate the help mate.

    How can you tell it's a XX7 ?

    Just wondering if you have any bucket seats, interior door panels and kick panels for sale?

    I spoke to you a while ago and I knew you had a few holden parts for sale.

    Cheers Alex
    XX7 is 2000 kg, rarer XU3 is 2200 kg.
    "All correspondence must bear these numbers"

  8. #8
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    Quote Originally Posted by wbute View Post
    Thanks Jason, I was sure I had read it somewhere and was nearly going to suggest asking you;).
    So all Holdens from Adelaide fall into this category? That should confuse peiople in 50 years time
    Just saw this post. I don't think it should ever cause any confusion, as in the wider picture for the more valuable Holdens and Toranas the numerical part of the PSN normally doesn't match the BODY number. It's really only a 1973ish onwards thing and only from some plants. The main reason I can see that Elizabeth didn't change to the matching BODY and PSN setup was because they were building bodies for Dandenong and Pagewood hence they'd have had big gaps in their PSN numbering. As the records were listed by PSN it would have created a problem for them. I don't think it is a coincidence that Pagewood and Dandenong commercial production ceased pretty close to the time that Elizabeth started using PSN's as BODY numbers.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •