answers to quotes from 2t from his last post..
I will now use your "Sinbox" as an example.
2T STATES ..You started with 2 vehicles. A WB ute and a WB van. You needed to make a decision that one must die so the other shall live.

OZ REPLIES..no ....i never needed to make a decision as to what should die or live...van was only good for its body and ute was only good for its chassis and motor..

2T STATES..Now, If you had have known exactly what the law states you could had done it this way.
Screw the rego papers of the ute up and start with the van. You now use the chassis from the ute to repair the van. You have now repaired the van so the identity of the van continues. Even if you used a HQ chassis the above quoted clause would make your vans identity remain as a WB van on the rego papers with HQ chassis identifier similar to mine.

OZ REPLIES...if i did it that way i would be effecting brand new registration in nsw.obviously i know my rules and regulations for me to effect a body change while still keeping the primary vehicle registered..

2T STATES..To sum that up....
A re-body. the identity of the vehicle stays same as the vehicle started with. A chassis. Making your claim about the identity staying with the chassis Correct!

OZ REPLIES..ah yeh???...weve covered that bit before..

2T STATES...A re-chassis. The identity of the vehicle stays the same as the vehicle started with. Making your claim about the identity staying with the chassis Wrong!

OZ REPLIES..not in nsw or victoria..this has already been established by showing you legal documents from those states...
a re chassis in nsw gives the vehicle a new identity therefore effecting new registration therefore its original identity {the tags} are not valid anymore..

2T STATES..
I understand that is a lot to get your head around in 1 go but you claim you know law so should have no problem with it..

OZ REPLIES..i have no problem getting my head around anything that is logical and proven..i have never claimed i know law but i do know my business and laws relating to the registration of motor vehicles and what forms the identity..
you can come back time and time again with new angles to this debate 2t but you are becoming a bit like an ex wife...
an annoying bitch that will not listen to reason nor read or digest any documents relating to the custody or visiting rights of the chassis and tags..

--- Updated ---

2T STATES..Sorry another long post but if you want to debate law... what can I say.

OZ REPLIES...No..i am beginning to believe that the debate is not about laws as i know and understand them but laws as you need them interpreted to add value to your van which does not have a correct chassis to match the tags.
which of course will never happen.

2T STATES...Spent some time today chatting with a "Technical identity Officer" from ACT RTA

OZ REPLIES..that must have been rivetting..?

2T STATES..He stated that the id info on my papers was correct and will remain that way if re-registered.

OZ REPLIES...it may not be correct as the current laws stand but it will remain that way as long as it stays in current registration..once registration has expired and you or any one else goes to effect new registration it wont be that way anymore.

2T STATES...A side note: I eventually fessed up that I also, am looking for info for a debate regarding the identity of a sandman.

OZ REPLIES..did you also tell him that you are trying to justify your incorrect numbers so that in your eyes the value will be the same as a REAL sandman..

2T STATES..."A sandman is no longer a sandman if the chassis has been changed according to law". His reply was What? What has a chassis got to do with the fact its a Sandman. The way i know a Sandman its all to do with the body"

OZ REPLIES...sandman is an option package so yay you still have a sandman by virtue of tags and body but to make it complete and worth anything it all has too match...as stated at the beginning of the debate...FULL CIRCLE..