is the mailman lost?I won't continue with the merry go round of I said you said but I will put you straight to yet again an assumption on your behalf.
If my only concern was monetary value I would have just re-stamped the chassis.
If you go back to my introduction post that you so graciously highlighted where I made it clear my van had an incorrect chassis from the start, you will also read that from a young age I always wanted a Sandman. I now believe I have one. Not a 100% sandman but a Sandman. I want to be able to open my bonnet and let other people look at my van and not have some big mouth know it all say "Thats not a Sandman! I read on the sandman site that an mismatch chassis means this van is a HQ!"
When V6HQUTE posted up the joy he was having in finding a Sandman (Albeit the deal fell through) you did exactly that to him. This gave me the motivation to read and seek knowledge to make my own informed opinion and challenge what you claim to set the record straight.
Now I'm sure you will come back about what I just said with some non relevant dribble to make yourself feel bigger . The fact is we are talking about what you claim. Lets just recap what it is you claim.
A sandman is no longer a sandman if the chassis has been swapped!
The vehicle is now the vehicle that was attached to the chassis including it's model designation!
This is law!
Can you keep you responses relevant to the topic please?
My next response to your claims will take some time as snail mail is involved.
Bookmarks