I have the brochures in front of me now.
The photo of the inside of the rear of the van in the HQ Sandman brochure (dated January '74) is the same as the photo in the December '72 commercial brochure. The van colour is slightly different. The photo angle is the same. It is unlikely that they would have got the exact same angle on another van. The colour difference would be easiily achieved even in the 70's (and was probably unintentional). The interior photo from the Sandman brochure is exactly the same as the interior photo of the GTS interior as included in the August '73 general brochure with the exception of the seat insert material. Including the small splash of red in the lower left corner. Again the photo angle is exactly the same including the steering boss insert being vertical. The light area behind the seat in the GTS may have been coloured out in the Sandman brochure as you can still see the door pillar line in the Sandman brochure. This would not have existed in either a ute or a van.
I am left with the original theory - the sandman photos in the brochure seem to be mock ups. Let the CSI investigation continue.
Mauser is correct, the console has a blanking piece in the rear to cover the hole as his photo shows.
Byron, by flat topped console I did mean the console without the full length depression/cavity rather than the earlier version that only held the seat belt buckles.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks