Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: more on fakes are liable...

  1. #1
    It's a rockin' mauser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    1,148

    more on fakes are liable...

    Love the banter with the judge.... in the court judgement

    http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/c...-1226387512280

    http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgme.../QDC11-294.pdf

    Just advertise a Van as a 2-seater ... seems really silly.

    Mauser
    “485650 HQ's cant be wrong...”
    “You don’t drive a Kingswood, you make love to it. That’s why nuns only drive Toranas.” - Ted Bullpitt

  2. #2
    Cruiser buck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    albury / wodonga
    Posts
    358
    wow , thats really interesting reading, could not stop reading it. what happened to the $90k they originally got for the car?
    Driver -1981 WB kingswood 253 4 speed
    Weekend- AC Cobra replica 302ho(425hp) 4 speed toploader
    Project Complete- SLR 5000 LH mock up(next door Neighbors)
    never late in a 5.0 litre

  3. #3
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    Certainly. Advertise a van as van with GTS bits on it and put photos of ID plates. That way you have never mislead anyone, and if it turns out to be dodgy you can't be accused of false advertising. What would be interesting is if a car was rebodied in its early days be an insurance company, and the case ended in court.

  4. #4
    It's a rockin' Robbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    1,572
    A very reasonable outcome for a change. Commonsense prevailed.
    "Proud To Be An Old Fart".

  5. #5
    It's a rockin' Sandaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Picton NSW
    Posts
    1,129
    Couple of nuff nuffs defending themselves in a $100K case, may have been wise to get some legal advice.

  6. #6
    Night Rider Vombil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Western Suburbs
    Posts
    2,630
    What ever happened to 'in good faith' ?? pretty bazaar the defendants got hung out if they had no knowledge it was not a genuine gt themselves. It's as though they had been punished for turning a dollar on it. Ie 18 becomes 90
    BQZ

  7. #7
    Leadfoot 0488TINTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Wetherill Park NSW
    Posts
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by Vombil View Post
    It's as though they had been punished for turning a dollar on it. Ie 18 becomes 90
    I think from memory "technically" you can't make a profit from selling cars without a dealers licence

  8. #8
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    Yes you can, nothing stopping anyone from buying a GTS327 for $25k 10 years ago and selling it today for $125k. You just aren't allowed to do it regularly.

  9. #9
    Sandman Driver Rico's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Benalla Victoria
    Posts
    519
    I think you can really only buy and sell 4 or 5 cars a year without requiring an LMD or LMCT number.

    It sorta stinks that when the guy confirmed the numbers with Ford that they said yes, how come they didnt pick up on the possible rebirth then?
    Last edited by Rico; 25-06-2012 at 10:39 AM.

  10. #10
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    The issue is truth in advertising, not that the car is a fake or re-body. From the way I understand it, the fake is fine. It just cannot be advertised as genuine. So take it to a car show, bonnet up, For Sale sign. Say nothing. Then you are OK, and are covered just in case your car isn't as genuine as you think.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •