Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 86

Thread: please help hq sandman???

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Night Rider Valencia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,096
    Is there more than one shade of orchard metallic because i have seen a lighter one on a torana

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Taily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    NW Sydney
    Posts
    1,185
    Quote Originally Posted by Glacier 73 View Post
    Is there more than one shade of orchard metallic because i have seen a lighter one on a torana
    I'm not sure. I always thought it was one of the colours that looked quite dark in low light and quite bright in the direct sunlight.
    Nunc est bibendum...

  3. #3
    P Plater r0bb0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    sunbury
    Posts
    74
    found some more useless info today regarding the paint code and the long middle tag
    wm70rdl266096q
    wm-belmont
    70-panel van
    r-253 high comp
    d- 1974
    l2- Adelaide
    66096 build
    q- hq
    was looking at old holden colour chart from 1973 and orchid was not available for belmonts
    Image.jpg

  4. #4
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    Quote Originally Posted by r0bb0 View Post
    found some more useless info today regarding the paint code and the long middle tag
    wm70rdl266096q
    wm-belmont
    70-panel van
    r-253 high comp
    d- 1974
    l2- Adelaide
    66096 build
    q- hq
    was looking at old holden colour chart from 1973 and orchid was not available for belmonts
    Image.jpg
    That is right, and officially the only way you could normally get metallic on a Belmont in 1974 was with a Sandman optioned Belmont. But CTV (colour trim variation) was a relatively easy thing to do, not only normal colours where they shouldn't be but also totally left field colours as well like a HK colour on a HQ etc. So whilst Orchid says your HQ is more than likely a Sandman, it isn't an iron clad guarantee.

  5. #5
    Leadfoot buickzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    137
    Metallic coloured vans were common in HQ series and certainly during 1973 and 1974, very few of them were Sandmans. None of the 1973's could have been Sandmans, but they were metallic coloured and I don't believe that you should use metallic paint as one of the basis for determining whether a vehicle is a Sandman. HK has a much better and mnore comprehensive list of ways to sort out what was what.

  6. #6
    Night Rider Vombil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Western Suburbs
    Posts
    2,630
    Quote Originally Posted by HK1837 View Post
    That is right, and officially the only way you could normally get metallic on a Belmont in 1974 was with a Sandman optioned Belmont. But CTV (colour trim variation) was a relatively easy thing to do, not only normal colours where they shouldn't be but also totally left field colours as well like a HK colour on a HQ etc. So whilst Orchid says your HQ is more than likely a Sandman, it isn't an iron clad guarantee.
    I tell you one thing... if you're an HQ Sandman owner holding your hopes of legitimacy on some centre console mounts you'd have to be te type of fella that enjoys a punt as well
    BQZ

  7. #7
    It's a rockin' mauser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    1,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Vombil View Post
    I tell you one thing... if you're an HQ Sandman owner holding your hopes of legitimacy on some centre console mounts you'd have to be te type of fella that enjoys a punt as well
    As we have discussed previously, I dont know why you would order a HQ Belmont van in '74 and option it to be a 2-seater with bucket seats, CTV order the metallic paint, tack in a V8 with a 4-speed and not tick the box for the Sandman package on the order form. Without the downrated GVM as a discouragement I doubt most people would violently object to the addition of the console, GTS guards and dash. If the van was built on spec for dealer lots, I would imagine it didnt have those options unless it was a Sandman. HQ Kingswood utes on the other hand could of been common with the above options and not be a Sandman.

    Mauser
    “485650 HQ's cant be wrong...”
    “You don’t drive a Kingswood, you make love to it. That’s why nuns only drive Toranas.” - Ted Bullpitt

  8. #8
    Night Rider Vombil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Western Suburbs
    Posts
    2,630
    Quote Originally Posted by mauser View Post
    As we have discussed previously, I dont know why you would order a HQ Belmont van in '74 and option it to be a 2-seater with bucket seats, CTV order the metallic paint, tack in a V8 with a 4-speed and not tick the box for the Sandman package on the order form. Without the downrated GVM as a discouragement I doubt most people would violently object to the addition of the console, GTS guards and dash. If the van was built on spec for dealer lots, I would imagine it didnt have those options unless it was a Sandman. HQ Kingswood utes on the other hand could of been common with the above options and not be a Sandman.

    Mauser


    my point is with the fakers. pretty easy to fake one if you have a buckets manual v8 belmont built in 74. seen a few later models with 'sandman' specs that probably aren't, that's all. it's the doubt that creeps in. you're not going to pay a premium for a sandman if you can't prove it is one... after you've ticked all the boxes then you need to find if its original body. LOTS of question marks
    BQZ

  9. #9
    Night Rider Valencia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,096
    Dont think thats hainzys van

  10. #10
    Moderator Alien DNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,315
    Those side pipes are an acquired taste though

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •