Is there more than one shade of orchard metallic because i have seen a lighter one on a torana
Is there more than one shade of orchard metallic because i have seen a lighter one on a torana
found some more useless info today regarding the paint code and the long middle tag
wm70rdl266096q
wm-belmont
70-panel van
r-253 high comp
d- 1974
l2- Adelaide
66096 build
q- hq
was looking at old holden colour chart from 1973 and orchid was not available for belmonts
Image.jpg
That is right, and officially the only way you could normally get metallic on a Belmont in 1974 was with a Sandman optioned Belmont. But CTV (colour trim variation) was a relatively easy thing to do, not only normal colours where they shouldn't be but also totally left field colours as well like a HK colour on a HQ etc. So whilst Orchid says your HQ is more than likely a Sandman, it isn't an iron clad guarantee.
Metallic coloured vans were common in HQ series and certainly during 1973 and 1974, very few of them were Sandmans. None of the 1973's could have been Sandmans, but they were metallic coloured and I don't believe that you should use metallic paint as one of the basis for determining whether a vehicle is a Sandman. HK has a much better and mnore comprehensive list of ways to sort out what was what.
As we have discussed previously, I dont know why you would order a HQ Belmont van in '74 and option it to be a 2-seater with bucket seats, CTV order the metallic paint, tack in a V8 with a 4-speed and not tick the box for the Sandman package on the order form. Without the downrated GVM as a discouragement I doubt most people would violently object to the addition of the console, GTS guards and dash. If the van was built on spec for dealer lots, I would imagine it didnt have those options unless it was a Sandman. HQ Kingswood utes on the other hand could of been common with the above options and not be a Sandman.
Mauser
“485650 HQ's cant be wrong...”
“You don’t drive a Kingswood, you make love to it. That’s why nuns only drive Toranas.” - Ted Bullpitt
my point is with the fakers. pretty easy to fake one if you have a buckets manual v8 belmont built in 74. seen a few later models with 'sandman' specs that probably aren't, that's all. it's the doubt that creeps in. you're not going to pay a premium for a sandman if you can't prove it is one... after you've ticked all the boxes then you need to find if its original body. LOTS of question marks
BQZ
Those side pipes are an acquired taste though![]()
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks