Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Is this a sandman

  1. #21
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    Quote Originally Posted by wbute View Post
    Was it possible they optioned one tonner springs and increased the GCM that way? It lifted the GCM on a one tonner to 2600 and that is the difference I assume between one tonners and utes or is that increased through heavier duty tyres?
    Springs aren't the issue, they are the same for XX7 or XU3. It is the tyres that have the extra load rating. You could option a gross load package but that is on a 2155/2200kg ute or van. Doing it to an XX7 or XU4 defeats the whole purpose of using passenger vehicle tyres to drop the GVW. Tonners get their extra GVW (2600kg 6cyl, 2660kg V8) from:

    Rear springs.
    Rear axle on 6cyl.
    Axles.
    Heavy duty rear wheel bearing retainers.
    Front and rear unis.
    Heat treated front stubs.
    Front springs
    Heavy duty 6" rims.
    Light truck type tyres.

    Plus of course the lightweight cab-chassis, which in a HZ Tares in at only 1242kg, so add a 100kg alloy tray and you are looking at a registered vehicle weight of only 1342kg. Plenty of room for 1000kg load and 3 x people in the cab. V8 is 1314kg Tare.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by acmd View Post
    image.jpg (695.8 KB)
    image.jpg (691.7 KB)
    image.jpg (1.17 MB)
    I hope this works hk it's the first time I've tried plus it's through my phone

    - - - Updated - - -

    The red used to be one of the colours of this ute I've found out while rubbing back
    Those look like real plates to me, my initial thought when I heard about the 1950kg was that someone had made up a set of fake plates but these have the proper markers for original plates.
    The red is probably the red oxide electrostatic primer. Acacia Ridge painted the cars with the body tag on in HX at this time.

  2. #22
    I am confused How do explain my hx at 2200 kgs its 1400 tare 2200 gvm the same 83 wb kingswood but different to Hz kingswood it was 1950 gvm tare unknown hx has heavier springs than the wb 5 springs vs 4 on wb

  3. #23
    Learner Driver
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    10
    so why do you think the GVW is what it is ? and the colour is a bit unusual as well

  4. #24
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    Quote Originally Posted by acmd View Post
    so why do you think the GVW is what it is ? and the colour is a bit unusual as well
    Colour is fine, 1887 was a normal HX colour. GVW is a mistake I think, but doesn't matter, it is still a reduced GVW to match the other pair of plates.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Beachy View Post
    I am confused How do explain my hx at 2200 kgs its 1400 tare 2200 gvm the same 83 wb kingswood but different to Hz kingswood it was 1950 gvm tare unknown hx has heavier springs than the wb 5 springs vs 4 on wb
    2200kg is normal for HJ-WB V8 ute and van. 1950kg on a HZ Kingswood must be a van and it will be an XU4 (same thing as XX7 but not a Sandman). If the HX has heavier springs than a standard HQ-WB ute or van it means it either was optioned with F72 (gross load equipment which is tonner rear springs) or someone has put tonner rear springs under it. The springs on the HZ XU4 Kingswood will be the same as any other normal HQ-WB ute or van too.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    4,463
    If you could option F72 then wouldn't they have specified the same tyres as a one tonner and lifted the GVM as well?

  6. #26
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    Quote Originally Posted by wbute View Post
    If you could option F72 then wouldn't they have specified the same tyres as a one tonner and lifted the GVM as well?
    Because of all the other tonner bits that would be needed too, which would include a Salisbury rear axle on 6cyl vehicles. Plus a special tailshaft with 1.125"unis front and rear.

    I don't think you could get F72 outside of the XW5 "Outback Equipment Package" either, and it didn't increase the GVW of the vehicle otherwise all the other tonner bits would be needed as well. As far as i'm aware the F72 springs were for a constant load increase eg a canopy on a ute or permanent toolboxes or racks in a van.

  7. #27
    Learner Driver
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    10
    So is this a sandman or no?

  8. #28
    Night Rider Innuendo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,451
    Quote Originally Posted by acmd View Post
    So is this a sandman or no?
    100% Sandman (well at least the tags shown are).

  9. #29
    Learner Driver
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    10
    Thanks everyone for your input now its just down to what to do back to original or i'd like to change colour to a white and put some decals on but thats way down the road

  10. #30
    The Hz was a 5 lt ute the hx ticks all the sandman boxes except for the 2200 kg gvm would you describe it as a sandman with a f 72 option

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •