Could this be a sandman - Chassis swap

[playwme]

I won't continue with the merry go round of I said you said but I..........

I hate to be the one to point out the obvious..........

Lets just recap what it is you claim.

A sandman is no longer a sandman if the chassis has been swapped!
The vehicle is now the vehicle that was attached to the chassis including it's model designation!
This is law!

Can you keep you responses relevant to the topic please?

Didn't you ask for LEGAL proof? There seems to be a lot of jumping between whether the discussion is about whether it's a Sandman
a- in the eyes of the law (RTA).
b- in the eyes of the owner.
c- in the eyes of a buyer.

Can you please clarify which one you would like to debate?

[ozbox]

I hate to be the one to point out the obvious..........





Didn't you ask for LEGAL proof? There seems to be a lot of jumping between whether the discussion is about whether it's a Sandman
a- in the eyes of the law (RTA).
b- in the eyes of the owner.
c- in the eyes of a buyer.

Can you please clarify which one you would like to debate?

as far as i know i am debating question a-

legal proof has been submitted to 2t.

by myself and mr a goat.

question b is totally up to the owner if he is happy with the fact that he doesnt have a matching chassis to tags sandman...value not up there as its not matching.

question c ..this debate has now opened the eyes of all readers to the value of what they are buying and to be aware that they are buying something which is tainted in the eyes of collectors.

2t i cant wait for your next lot of interpritations to our chassis to tags debate...snail mail ay..interesting..