Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: intake manifold and carbies

  1. #21
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    It defintely was GMH's first toe in the water with some sort of race special idea. The engine itself though was the same as the other 179's in that is wasn't a performance option engine, the extra performance came from the fact it was a manual and the only other EH's in 1963 with a 179 were autos as the standard crash box couldn't handle the 179. Being blueprinted shows you how serious they were to try and make the things last in race conditions. The extra performance of the HR 186S 4spd isn't all engine either, the 3.55:1 diff had a lot to do with it. That coupled with 13" tyres makes for pretty low gearing.

  2. #22
    It's a rockin'
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    1,067
    Quote Originally Posted by HJRAY View Post
    Seen a x2 set up on a hr over the weekend and I loved the look of it , are they good preformers.?
    did you find anything interesting on the weekend ?
    Last edited by thatotherguy; 12-06-2013 at 06:02 PM.

  3. #23
    Night Rider Innuendo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,450
    I've got all the literature on all the earlies, unfortunately everything was recently put away into storage because we are about to put our house on the market and had to de-clutter.
    Whatever the case, neither were rockets. A couple friends of mine own S4's, one has it sitting in the Mt Panorama museum the other in Thirlmere.

  4. #24
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    You are right, neither set the world on fire. The HR being almost as quick as an XR GT must have made it frighten a few V8 cars in its day, until it spat its Opel box! Imagine owning an XT GT or even an early XW GT, and having Dave Bennet's HR Premier keeping pace with you between the lights?

  5. #25
    P Plater trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    adelaide hills
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by HK1837 View Post
    You are right, neither set the world on fire. The HR being almost as quick as an XR GT must have made it frighten a few V8 cars in its day, until it spat its Opel box! Imagine owning an XT GT or even an early XW GT, and having Dave Bennet's HR Premier keeping pace with you between the lights?
    would be a good 20m race

  6. #26
    It's a rockin' Robbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    1,572
    As soon as the gt hit it's straps, it would blow the HR off the road. The gt was the complete package,it achieved what it was built for.
    "Proud To Be An Old Fart".

  7. #27
    Cruiser
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    port priest south australia
    Posts
    221
    Quote Originally Posted by thatotherguy View Post
    did you find anything interesting on the weekend ?
    Yes seen plenty of intresting stuf everything from fj to all sorts of gts s rusting away and nobody will sell

  8. #28
    Sandman Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,451
    Dave Bennett's HR was 2 seconds quicker to 100mph than a stock XR GT. So there would be no blowing that HR off the road! The XT GT was tested at the time with the same 1/4 mile time as the XR but was 0.8s quicker 0-60mph than the XR so the XR was actually quicker than the XT over 60mph to the end of the 1/4 (XR: 15.8s 1/4, 9.7s 0-60mph, XT: 15.8s 1/4, 8.5s 0-60mph). Bennett's HR was basically equal to an XW GT in straight line performance. The XR GT was built because Ford got wind of what was coming from Holden, and it wasn't good enough - it got trounced two years running at Bathurst by the Monaros. GMH had some serious Monaros built and tested and if they'd used those rather than the little Toranas in all likelihood Ford would never have seen a GT sedan win Bathurst after 1967. You'll all be able to read about these cars one day!

    Here is a quaint and pretty straight-shooting article about the 186S HR:
    http://www.uniquecarsandparts.com.au...den_hr_186.htm

  9. #29
    P Plater trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    adelaide hills
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by HK1837 View Post
    Dave Bennett's HR was 2 seconds quicker to 100mph than a stock XR GT. So there would be no blowing that HR off the road! The XT GT was tested at the time with the same 1/4 mile time as the XR but was 0.8s quicker 0-60mph than the XR so the XR was actually quicker than the XT over 60mph to the end of the 1/4 (XR: 15.8s 1/4, 9.7s 0-60mph, XT: 15.8s 1/4, 8.5s 0-60mph). Bennett's HR was basically equal to an XW GT in straight line performance. The XR GT was built because Ford got wind of what was coming from Holden, and it wasn't good enough - it got trounced two years running at Bathurst by the Monaros. GMH had some serious Monaros built and tested and if they'd used those rather than the little Toranas in all likelihood Ford would never have seen a GT sedan win Bathurst after 1967. You'll all be able to read about these cars one day!

    Here is a quaint and pretty straight-shooting article about the 186S HR:
    http://www.uniquecarsandparts.com.au...den_hr_186.htm
    imagine if like holden ford got their more powerful motors from the states and put them into their falcons ie boss 351 then the monaro would never have one a bathurst
    we can go on about what ifs forever but fact is the little hr has no cred

  10. #30
    Night Rider Innuendo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,450
    Quote Originally Posted by trash View Post
    imagine if like holden ford got their more powerful motors from the states and put them into their falcons ie boss 351 then the monaro would never have one a bathurst
    we can go on about what ifs forever but fact is the little hr has no cred
    I think you were meaning "won" a Bathurst?
    Holden could have and almost did release the big block Chev engine variants. Sure the HR was nothing much. But Holden always had Fords measure, both here locally and in the States.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bob Fisher manifold.
    By RAEME in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19-11-2014, 03:08 AM
  2. AFR Composite plastic intake manifold
    By Alien DNA in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-03-2014, 12:01 AM
  3. HZ 308 Inlet Manifold
    By XX7SANDMN in forum Engine
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-02-2013, 09:21 AM
  4. 253 Manifold options
    By Blocker in forum Engine
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 30-08-2011, 09:31 AM
  5. Casting sand in new intake Manifold
    By jennie285 in forum Engine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 27-03-2011, 09:30 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •